Science and Policy-Making: towards a new dialogue
29th – 30th September 2016, Brussels, Belgium
REGISTRATION IS NOW OPEN. TO REGISTER CLICK HERE.
“Science advice has never been in greater demand; nor has it been more contested.” The most complex and sensitive policy issues of our time are those for which the available scientific evidence is ever growing and multi-disciplined, but still has uncertainties. Yet these are the very issues for which scientific input is needed most. In this environment, the usefulness and legitimacy of expertise seems obvious to scientists, but is this view shared by policy-makers?
A two-day conference will take place in Brussels, Belgium, on Thursday 29th and Friday 30th September 2016. Jointly organised by the European Commission and the International Network for Government Science Advice (INGSA), the conference will bring together users and providers of scientific advice on critical, global issues. Policy-makers, leading practitioners and scholars in the field of science advice to governments, as well as other stakeholders, will explore principles and practices in a variety of current and challenging policy contexts. It will also present the new Scientific Advice Mechanism of the European Commission to the international community. Through keynote lectures and plenary discussions and topical parallel sessions, the conference aims to take a major step towards responding to the challenge best articulated by the World Science Forum Declaration of 2015:
“The need to define the principles, processes and application of science advice and to address the theoretical and practical questions regarding the independence, transparency, visibility and accountability of those who receive and provide advice has never been more important. We call for concerted action of scientists and policy-makers to define and promulgate universal principles for developing and communicating science to inform and evaluate policy based on responsibility, integrity, independence, and accountability.”
The conference seeks to:
- Identify core principles and best practices, common to structures providing scientific advice for governments worldwide.
- Identify practical ways to improve the interaction of the demand and supply side of scientific advice.
- Describe, by means of practical examples, the impact of effective science advisory processes.
The Programme Committee comprises:
Eva Alisic, Co-Chair of the Global Young Academy
Tateo Arimoto, Director of Science, Technology and Innovation Programme; The Japanese National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
Peter Gluckman, Chair of INGSA and Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor, New Zealand (co-chair)
Robin Grimes, UK Foreign Office Chief Scientific Adviser
Heide Hackmann, International Council for Science (ICSU)
Theodoros Karapiperis, European Parliament – Head of Scientific Foresight Unit (STOA), European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS) – Science and Technology Options Assessment Panel
Johannes Klumpers, European Commission, Head of Unit – Scientific Advice Mechanism (SAM) (co-chair)
Martin Kowarsch, Head of the Working Group Scientific assessments, Ethics and Public Policy, Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change
David Mair, European Commission – Joint Research Centre (JRC)
Rémi Quirion, Chief Scientist, Province of Québec, Canada
Flavia Schlegel, UNESCO Assistant Director-General for the Natural Sciences
Henrik Wegener, Executive Vice President, Chief Academic Officer, Provost at Technical University of Denmark, Chair of the EU High Level Group of Scientific Advisors
James Wilsdon, Chair of INGSA, Professor of Research Policy, Director of Impact & Engagement, University of Sheffield
For more information visit the conference website.
 James Wilsdon, Professor of Research Policy, Director of Impact & Engagement, University of Scheffield, 2014 Briefing document http://www.globalscienceadvice.org/archive-2014-conference/resources/
 Michael Gibbons, secretary-general of the Association of Commonwealth Universities, Science’s new social contract with society, Nature Volume 402, 2 December 1999 http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v402/n6761supp/pdf/402c81a0.pdf